<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Machine Learning Archives - Griffin Open Systems</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.griffinopensystems.com/tag/machine-learning/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.griffinopensystems.com/tag/machine-learning/</link>
	<description>Griffin Open Systems</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2021 18:50:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Comparison of State-of-the-Art Dynamic Machine Learning Methods for MPC of Coal-Fired Utility Generator Performance</title>
		<link>https://www.griffinopensystems.com/comparison-of-state-of-the-art-dynamic-machine-learning-methods-for-mpc-of-coal-fired-utility-generator-performance/</link>
					<comments>https://www.griffinopensystems.com/comparison-of-state-of-the-art-dynamic-machine-learning-methods-for-mpc-of-coal-fired-utility-generator-performance/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[admin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2021 14:17:42 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Griffin Insights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Artificial Intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Machine Learning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Power Generation]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.griffinopensystems.com/?p=1079</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The identity of the world’s electricity generating sources is evolving at a rapid rate. Significant additions of variable renewable energy sources (VREs) are fundamentally changing operating methods of existing fossil-fuel power plants. Real-time artificial intelligence optimization systems have been shown to consistently reduce emission rates of fossil-fuel power plants. In this presentation, Comparison of State-of-the-Art [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.griffinopensystems.com/comparison-of-state-of-the-art-dynamic-machine-learning-methods-for-mpc-of-coal-fired-utility-generator-performance/">Comparison of State-of-the-Art Dynamic Machine Learning Methods for MPC of Coal-Fired Utility Generator Performance</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.griffinopensystems.com">Griffin Open Systems</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The identity of the world’s electricity generating sources is evolving at a rapid rate. Significant additions of variable renewable energy sources (VREs) are fundamentally changing operating methods of existing fossil-fuel power plants. </p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Real-time artificial intelligence optimization systems have been shown to consistently reduce emission rates of fossil-fuel power plants. In this presentation, <a href="https://ann20-aiche.ipostersessions.com/Default.aspx?s=F3-31-E5-89-1A-1E-FE-10-0A-8C-20-97-E2-71-43-4A"><em>Comparison of State-of-the-Art Dynamic Machine Learning Methods for MPC of Coal-Fired Utility Generator Performance</em></a>, ten different dynamic machine learning methods are analyzed and applied to a case study to determine the optimal model for enhanced coal-fired utility generator performance. Each method was compared on their ability to accurately and reliably predict NOx emission rates from a coal-fired power plant 60 timesteps into the future.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">The most accurate and stable model for this application was the gated recurrent unit network (GRU), displaying an average RMSE of less than 5% across the complete time horizon, and a standard deviation of time horizon RMSE of less than 1%. <br><br><a href="https://ann20-aiche.ipostersessions.com/Default.aspx?s=F3-31-E5-89-1A-1E-FE-10-0A-8C-20-97-E2-71-43-4A"><em>See how the other models stacked up</em></a> and <a href="https://youtu.be/MH1hCwwBm4M"><em>watch a full presentation</em></a> on how accurate each method was at predicting the NOx emission rate.</p>



<p class="wp-block-paragraph">While operational support costs of using predictive machine learning models can be costly, the Griffin AI toolkit can be paired with the Power Plant Initiative, a maintenance program that reduces labor and maintenance costs. For a limited time save 80% on the Power Plant Initiative program with only a one year commitment or replace your existing system at a discounted installation rate. <a href="https://www.griffinopensystems.com/try-buy/"><em>Try the Griffin AI Toolkit</em></a> today or <a href="https://www.griffinopensystems.com/contact-us/"><em>contact us</em></a> to take advantage of the cost savings.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.griffinopensystems.com/comparison-of-state-of-the-art-dynamic-machine-learning-methods-for-mpc-of-coal-fired-utility-generator-performance/">Comparison of State-of-the-Art Dynamic Machine Learning Methods for MPC of Coal-Fired Utility Generator Performance</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.griffinopensystems.com">Griffin Open Systems</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.griffinopensystems.com/comparison-of-state-of-the-art-dynamic-machine-learning-methods-for-mpc-of-coal-fired-utility-generator-performance/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
